The Erosion Control Blogs

The Blogger

Janice Kaspersen Janice Kaspersen Erosion Control Editor

More from this blogger

  1. Ninety-Eight Percent Gone
  2. Two Weeks to StormCon
  3. Fighting Invasive Species of Another Sort
  4. Sacrificial Filtering
  5. China Landslides
  6. No Compensation for Beachfront Owners
  7. Sand and Oil
  8. Assessing the Effects of Oil
  9. Certifiable
  10. Clues in Sediment - and Oysters
  11. Tracking the Spill
  12. Louisiana's Wetlands
  13. Nobody's Home
  14. Saving Hitchcock Woods
  15. Dredging Up the Past
  16. Landslides
  17. Extreme Measures to Stop Flooding
  18. East Coast Flooding
  19. Well Done, Fargo
  20. Urban Logging
  21. A Large-Scale DIY Project
  22. Reconfiguring the Beach
  23. A Tiny Impediment to Shoreline Revetment
  24. Tougher Laws for Hillside Development
  25. Putting It All Back
  26. Building Beaches
  27. Moving Mountains
  28. Federal Standards for Florida A Precedent
  29. We Can't Even Go Back There
  30. What to Do About the Asian Carp
  31. Take a Few Minutes to Fill Out This Survey
  32. Lines in the Sand, Again
  33. Explaining What We Do
  34. EPA Issues Final Construction Site Guidelines
  35. Solving a Water Mystery in Bangladesh
  36. El Salvador Mudslides
  37. Trouble at Smuggler's Gulch
  38. Mud Follows Fire
  39. All Downhill From Here
  40. Support for Removing Dams
  41. LID Competition
  42. Finding Promise in Sediment
  43. StormCon 2010 Call for Papers
  44. More Stringent Mining Reviews
  45. Addressing Compost Questions
  46. Im Insulted
  47. Debating the Salt Cedar Beetle
  48. Join Us at StormCon '09 in Anaheim
  49. Tapping Opportunities
  50. Deforestation
  51. Green Jobs Our Jobs
  52. The Price of Perfection
  53. In Default
  54. A Year Later, It's Still Not Over
  55. Teaching Erosion Control
  56. The New Natural
  57. Recognizing Wetlands
  58. The Creek Is Closer Than You Think
  59. Sleight of Plan
  60. Fire Season Planning for What Comes Next
  61. Pulling the Plug on the Great Lakes
  62. Stimulus Money for Flood Control
  63. High-Speed Erosion
  64. StormCon Program Now Online
  65. Of Nutria and Men
  66. Energy versus the Environment
  67. Fire for Soil
  68. Biofuels vs Erosion Prevention
  69. Volunteer Labor
  70. Background Turbidity
  71. More on the Proposed ELG
  72. Debating the Cost of Effluent Limitations Guidelines
  73. Underwater
  74. Private Property, Public Funds
  75. All the Pages, None of the Trees
  76. Lines in the Sand
  77. Take a Look at What We've Added
  78. Cleaning Up in Tennessee
  79. Happy Holidays From Erosion Control
  80. Certification, Anyone
  81. Investing in the Infrastructure
  82. A River Runs Through It
  83. EPA's Proposed Effluent Limitation Guidelines Are Here
  84. Thank You, Firefighters
  85. Restoration Writ Large
  86. Between a Wall and a Hard Place
  87. Another Tool for Restoration
  88. StormCon Abstract Deadline Is Five Weeks Away
  89. A Change to Construction Permitting Not Yet, But Hold On
  90. The LEEDing Edge
  91. The Seed Dilemma
  92. An Overzealous Cleaning
  93. The State of the Infrastructure
  94. StormCon 2009 Call for Papers
  95. Effluent Guidelines for Construction Sites
  96. Assessing Risks After Gustav
  97. Where There Was Smoke, There Will Be Flooding
  98. Looking for Data on BMP Performance
  99. More Than Just the Articles
view all

EC Editor's Blog

July 21st, 2009 6:34am PST

The World in a Grain of Sand

Posted By Janice Kaspersen Comments

Size matters, it turns out, in all sorts of situations, not least in judging grains of sand. Beach nourishment projects need to match the size of the imported grains as closely as possible to the existing sand on the beach, and it’s not always easy to find a good match.

So residents of Estero Island, off southwestern Florida, would seem to be in luck: A suitable source of sand has been found less than two miles away. The plan is to dredge and pump about a million cubic yards of it to nourish 4.6 miles of the island’s eroding Fort Meyers Beach. The project would widen the beach an average of 160 feet, creating vegetated dunes.

Not everyone is happy about the find, though. Of the 226 properties along this stretch of beach, a third of the owners don’t want to grant access to their land to allow the project to be completed.

There are different reasons for the objections. Some property owners just don’t think the erosion problem is that bad. (A study by the state’s Bureau of Beaches and Coastal Systems calls the beach “critically eroded” and says the erosion is “threatening development and recreational interests.”) Others feel the $10.5 million beach nourishment effort is a waste of money. (It’s only indirectly their own money, however; the work will be funded by the town of Fort Meyers Beach, bed taxes from the Lee County Tourist Development Council, and the state’s Department of Environmental Protection. The bed taxes in particular are out-of-towners’ money, levied on hotel rooms for the tourists who come to enjoy the local beaches.) Still others are afraid that building dunes will change the fundamental character of the beach.

No matter how bad, or not, the existing situation is, adding sand and building dunes will no doubt change the dynamics of the beach and the future patterns of erosion. The bigger question here is whether property owners should have the right to opt out of a project like this one. A spokesman for the city of Fort Meyers Beach says that if some owners deny access to their property, those parcels will be passed over, with dunes rising on either side—potentially creating a worse problem for them as water is directed in between the dunes.

You can find more details in this article from the Fort Meyers News-Press. Public discussions on the project are ongoing.

 

What Do You Think?

Post a Comment

Be the first to tell us what you think!

Post a Comment

Not a subscriber? Sign Up
 
 
*  
 




 

Get Erosion Control E-mail Updates!

Get weekly news and updates through our Erosion Control e-mail newsletter!