The Erosion Control Blogs

The Blogger

Janice Kaspersen Janice Kaspersen Erosion Control Editor

More from this blogger

  1. One Farmer at a Time
  2. Looking Back at Katrina
  3. Flooding in Pakistan
  4. Thanks to the StormCon Moderators!
  5. Ninety-Eight Percent Gone
  6. Two Weeks to StormCon
  7. Fighting Invasive Species of Another Sort
  8. Sacrificial Filtering
  9. China Landslides
  10. No Compensation for Beachfront Owners
  11. Sand and Oil
  12. Assessing the Effects of Oil
  13. Certifiable
  14. Clues in Sediment - and Oysters
  15. Tracking the Spill
  16. Louisiana's Wetlands
  17. Nobody's Home
  18. Saving Hitchcock Woods
  19. Dredging Up the Past
  20. Landslides
  21. Extreme Measures to Stop Flooding
  22. East Coast Flooding
  23. Well Done, Fargo
  24. Urban Logging
  25. A Large-Scale DIY Project
  26. Reconfiguring the Beach
  27. A Tiny Impediment to Shoreline Revetment
  28. Tougher Laws for Hillside Development
  29. Putting It All Back
  30. Building Beaches
  31. Moving Mountains
  32. Federal Standards for Florida A Precedent
  33. We Can't Even Go Back There
  34. What to Do About the Asian Carp
  35. Take a Few Minutes to Fill Out This Survey
  36. Lines in the Sand, Again
  37. Explaining What We Do
  38. EPA Issues Final Construction Site Guidelines
  39. Solving a Water Mystery in Bangladesh
  40. El Salvador Mudslides
  41. Trouble at Smuggler's Gulch
  42. Mud Follows Fire
  43. All Downhill From Here
  44. Support for Removing Dams
  45. LID Competition
  46. Finding Promise in Sediment
  47. StormCon 2010 Call for Papers
  48. More Stringent Mining Reviews
  49. Addressing Compost Questions
  50. Im Insulted
  51. Debating the Salt Cedar Beetle
  52. Join Us at StormCon '09 in Anaheim
  53. Tapping Opportunities
  54. Deforestation
  55. The World in a Grain of Sand
  56. Green Jobs Our Jobs
  57. In Default
  58. A Year Later, It's Still Not Over
  59. Teaching Erosion Control
  60. The New Natural
  61. Recognizing Wetlands
  62. The Creek Is Closer Than You Think
  63. Sleight of Plan
  64. Fire Season Planning for What Comes Next
  65. Pulling the Plug on the Great Lakes
  66. Stimulus Money for Flood Control
  67. High-Speed Erosion
  68. StormCon Program Now Online
  69. Of Nutria and Men
  70. Energy versus the Environment
  71. Fire for Soil
  72. Biofuels vs Erosion Prevention
  73. Volunteer Labor
  74. Background Turbidity
  75. More on the Proposed ELG
  76. Debating the Cost of Effluent Limitations Guidelines
  77. Underwater
  78. Private Property, Public Funds
  79. All the Pages, None of the Trees
  80. Lines in the Sand
  81. Take a Look at What We've Added
  82. Cleaning Up in Tennessee
  83. Happy Holidays From Erosion Control
  84. Certification, Anyone
  85. Investing in the Infrastructure
  86. A River Runs Through It
  87. EPA's Proposed Effluent Limitation Guidelines Are Here
  88. Thank You, Firefighters
  89. Restoration Writ Large
  90. Between a Wall and a Hard Place
  91. Another Tool for Restoration
  92. StormCon Abstract Deadline Is Five Weeks Away
  93. A Change to Construction Permitting Not Yet, But Hold On
  94. The LEEDing Edge
  95. The Seed Dilemma
  96. An Overzealous Cleaning
  97. The State of the Infrastructure
  98. StormCon 2009 Call for Papers
  99. Effluent Guidelines for Construction Sites
  100. Assessing Risks After Gustav
  101. Where There Was Smoke, There Will Be Flooding
  102. Looking for Data on BMP Performance
  103. More Than Just the Articles
view all

EC Editor's Blog

July 6th, 2009 10:09am PST

The Price of Perfection

Posted By Janice Kaspersen Comments

Some places are just more expensive to live in than others. The cost of buying a home, or building one, varies tremendously.

But some residents (or would-be residents) in one of the country’s prettiest and most pristine areas are saying enough, already. The Tahoe Regional Planning Agency charges fees not only to cover its own expenses and costs, but also to mitigate the effects that new development might have on Lake Tahoe.

A recent article in the Tahoe Daily Tribune quotes a man who says the permitting fees for construction of his new 2,155-square-foot home have so far totaled $23,180.68, more than two-thirds of those from the Tahoe Regional Planning Agency. (That’s in addition to almost $19,000 for a sewer permit.) He calls the fees an example of “unchecked government.”

A TRPA spokesman, also quoted in the article, says the fees go toward protecting the lake: “It’s all going back into the product.” The agency itself has provided a list of the fees associated with construction of a home of this size in the area, which is quoted in the article. This is the list:

* $100 — Fee for monitoring water-quality impacts and permit conformance.

* $3,258.40 — Air quality mitigation fee for new residences. The fee is $325.84 per daily vehicle trip. Single-family dwellings create 10 daily vehicle trips, according to the International Traffic Engineering Manual.

* $88 — Information technology surcharge for all applications. Serves as cost recovery mechanism and funds equipment and systems upgrades.

* $365 — Off-site coverage mitigation to pay for water-quality issues resulting from the portion of the driveway apron that connects to the street.

* $263.40 — City of South Lake Tahoe cost recovery for TRPA review. Agencies that partner with TRPA add 10 percent to TRPA application filing fees to recover cost of administrating a memorandum of understanding with the TRPA.

* $2,370.60 — TRPA cost recovery for application review is $1.10 per square foot on new residential buildings. The city keeps this to pay for staff time reviewing the project. Includes all administration costs for permit review and site visits.

* $76 — TRPA cost recovery for administration of securities, finance team, etc.

* $2,901.60 — TRPA water-quality mitigation fund contribution based on square feet of impervious surfaces created. The current fee is $1.86 per square foot. Mitigation funds are a pass-through and go to the jurisdiction where a project is developed to fund water-quality improvement projects to offset the impact of development as a whole. TRPA collects no administration fees for water-quality mitigation funds and holds them in an account to accrue interest until the jurisdiction is ready to implement a project.

* $3,250 — Special water-quality mitigation for Tahoe Keys properties. Fee is a set amount per new home in the Keys and is not used often since there are few vacant parcels left.

What do you think? Are these reasonable fees for construction in an environmentally sensitive area?

What Do You Think?

Post a Comment

Be the first to tell us what you think!

Post a Comment

Not a subscriber? Sign Up
 
 
*  
 




 

Get Erosion Control E-mail Updates!

Get weekly news and updates through our Erosion Control e-mail newsletter!